Katie Couric Sued For $12 Million Over Anti-Gun Documentary

Katie Couric and her director have admitted to doctoring interviews for their film, and it’s now coming back to hit them where it hurts.

Katie Couric Sued For $12 Million Over Anti-Gun Documentary

Katie Couric’s anti-gun documentary Under the Gun has led to a $12 million lawsuit, and some foreshadow this ending her career.

Couric, whose career has included The Today Show, 60 Minutes and CBS Evening News, and her director Stephanie Soechtig are being sued following editing an answer given by a gun-rights group in Virginia to make it seem the group couldn’t answer the question, BearingArms.com reports.

Bearing Arms received documents detailing the lawsuit. The documents include:

“Second Amendment rights advocacy organization the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL), along with two of its members, today filed a $12 million defamation lawsuit against Katie Couric, director Stephanie Soechtig, Atlas Films, and Studio 3 Partners LLC d/b/a Epix for false and defamatory footage featured in the 2016 documentary film Under the Gun. The film portrays a fictional exchange in which members of the VCDL appear silent, stumped, and avoiding eye contact for nearly nine seconds after Katie Couric asks a question about background checks. An unedited audio recording of the interview reveals that—contrary to the portrayal in the film—the VCDL members had immediately begun responding to Couric’s question.
In the filing, the VCDL, Daniel L. Hawes, Esq., and Patricia Webb allege that the filmmakers knowingly and maliciously manufactured the fictional exchange by splicing in footage that the filmmakers took surreptitiously after telling the interviewees to be silent for ten seconds so that recording equipment could be calibrated. The filing also contains side-by-side screenshots of the film’s footage of the VCDL members and anti-gun advocates, alleging that the filmmakers manipulated lighting to cast shadows on the VCDL members and to make them appear sinister and untrustworthy. “We were horrified to see how Couric and her team manipulated us and the video footage to make us look like fools who didn’t stand up for the Second Amendment,” said Mr. Philip Van Cleave, President of the VCDL. “We want to set the record straight and hold them accountable for what they’ve done. You shouldn’t intentionally misrepresent someone’s views just because you disagree with them.”
The lawsuit, filed in federal court (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia– Richmond Division), seeks $12 million in compensatory damages, plus punitive damages. The VCDL, Mr. Hawes, and Ms. Webb are represented by Tom Clare, Libby Locke, and Megan Meier of Clare Locke LLP, a boutique law firm specializing in defamation litigation.”

In addition to the admitted editing changes, VCDL members allege they were victims of lighting tricks to give them a shadow and make them look evil and sinister, while gun-control supporters received much flattering lighting, Bearing Arms reports.

In total, VCDL, Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) Patricia Webb and attorney Daniel L. Hawes are seeking $12 million in compensatory damages, $350,000 each in punitive damages, attorney fees and costs and an injunction against “disseminating, distributing or publishing” any version of the film that includes the plaintiffs, Bearing Arms includes.

Soechtig and Couric have each admitted to knowingly editing the film for their own benefit, which Bearing Arms first reported in early June. To read the full lawsuit document, click here.


Comments on this site are submitted by users and are not endorsed by nor do they reflect the views or opinions of COLE Publishing, Inc. Comments are moderated before being posted.